Re: Benghazi related item
From:jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com
To: mkeefe@hillaryclinton.com
CC: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2015-11-05 22:37
Subject: Re: Benghazi related item
I'd fight it.
On Nov 5, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Maura Keefe
<mkeefe@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
Nita Lowey's office is asking for guidance
on whether to wage this fight
again on the omnibus or to let it lie,
given where we are on Benghazi.
※Annotation
Maura Keefe
Chief of Staff at U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen
シャヒーン上院議員のチーフスタッフ
Jeanne Shaheen
2009年よりニューハンプシャー州選出の
連邦上院議員(民主党)
私はそれと戦うと思います。
7時19分PM 2015年11月5日、マウラキーフ
Nita Loweyの事務所はこの戦いを繰り広げるか
どうかについてのガイダンスを求めています
私たちがベンガジにおいて 再びomnibusするか
それとも放って置くか
・ This provision, innocently titled “Preservation
and Transparency ofDepartment of State Records,” is merely
the latest effort in the Republicancrusade to profit politically
from the tragedy of Benghazi.
・This incident should motivate us to responsibly carry
out reforms to keep our diplomats safe;
instead it has inspired a scapegoating,
political exercise to influence
the 2016 presidential election.
・ The chairperson of the Benghazi Select Committee,
Congressman Gowdy, has been brazen in touting
this proposal to cut State Department funds based
on claims of delays in information sharing.
・ This is a red herring.
The State Department has already provided45,000
documents to the Select Committee, including
SecretaryClinton’s Benghazi-related emails.
・ I object to allowing the critical programs this bill
funds to help the most vulnerable people around
the world to be exploited for a destructive, frivolous
political attack.